he brought fear; but felt regret
I said these six words because when he came to take over the crown he had brought far to the city and than felt regret for killing people.
I would compaire King William to Pope Urban.
Same: different:
1.Both were types of rulers 1.Pope Urban was a ruler of the church
2.Both apart of battles 2. William was promised something
3. Both wanted something so badly they had killed 3. Different time periods
people for it.
I said these six words because when he came to take over the crown he had brought far to the city and than felt regret for killing people.
I would compaire King William to Pope Urban.
Same: different:
1.Both were types of rulers 1.Pope Urban was a ruler of the church
2.Both apart of battles 2. William was promised something
3. Both wanted something so badly they had killed 3. Different time periods
people for it.
didn't read first;freedom to all
These six words mean that he did not read the magna carta before he signed it and everyone was free.
These six words mean that he did not read the magna carta before he signed it and everyone was free.
The Magna Carta was signed in 1215, it was for the people to have the same rights as everyone else. It influenced the Bill of Rights because they wanted everyone to be treated equally.
Many people may think King Arthur was real, not real, or even both. When I first heard about King Arthur I had thought maybe he was real. But, then I had read and watched videos so I had made the decision that King Arthur was not real.
My first reason being that the Monks had made a burial site for King Arthur, yet the bones of King Arthur were “lost”. I see this as being a little suspicious because than there is not even a trace of him being deceased or live. If you do not have trace of your bones how would you know if this person was even real. For instance, you can have plays about you but that doesn’t mean they're real. Which brings me to my next point. King Arthur has a whole lot of plays that were fiction that were about him. That was what the whole story was based off of. Which says that he may not even be real. In addition, to having fictional plays he had pulled out a “magical” sword that only he could pull out of the stone. In addition to that he had a magical mentor named Merlin. I do not know if it is only me but magic does not exist. So, if it is A based off a fictional play BY his bones were lost and C only he could pull a sword out of the stone.
To back up that I do not think King Arthur is real there was a secret lake that the Lady of the Lake lived in. First, no human can physically live in a lake. You would need oxygen. It does not even make sense. Therefor, even if something lived in a lake it would not be a lady or a human. Most likely a fish or some sort of manual like a dolphin that they portrayed to be a lady. Next, when he was deceased they said that you would see him sleep in a cave. Personally, this cave either was far up or people were just crazy when they were there. Yes, you can see people sometimes that are dead but most likely if you were close to them. Not some ordinary person can not see people that are dead.
In conclusion, I tend to think that King Arthur is not real. Considering there was magic and fantasy involved.
My first reason being that the Monks had made a burial site for King Arthur, yet the bones of King Arthur were “lost”. I see this as being a little suspicious because than there is not even a trace of him being deceased or live. If you do not have trace of your bones how would you know if this person was even real. For instance, you can have plays about you but that doesn’t mean they're real. Which brings me to my next point. King Arthur has a whole lot of plays that were fiction that were about him. That was what the whole story was based off of. Which says that he may not even be real. In addition, to having fictional plays he had pulled out a “magical” sword that only he could pull out of the stone. In addition to that he had a magical mentor named Merlin. I do not know if it is only me but magic does not exist. So, if it is A based off a fictional play BY his bones were lost and C only he could pull a sword out of the stone.
To back up that I do not think King Arthur is real there was a secret lake that the Lady of the Lake lived in. First, no human can physically live in a lake. You would need oxygen. It does not even make sense. Therefor, even if something lived in a lake it would not be a lady or a human. Most likely a fish or some sort of manual like a dolphin that they portrayed to be a lady. Next, when he was deceased they said that you would see him sleep in a cave. Personally, this cave either was far up or people were just crazy when they were there. Yes, you can see people sometimes that are dead but most likely if you were close to them. Not some ordinary person can not see people that are dead.
In conclusion, I tend to think that King Arthur is not real. Considering there was magic and fantasy involved.